<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worldtown Hearsay :: The Recession&#8217;s Over (If you want it?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisisworldtown.com/2009/10/worldtown-hearsay-the-recessions-over-if-you-want-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisisworldtown.com/2009/10/worldtown-hearsay-the-recessions-over-if-you-want-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 05:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Krystle Lai</title>
		<link>http://thisisworldtown.com/2009/10/worldtown-hearsay-the-recessions-over-if-you-want-it/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Krystle Lai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisisworldtown.com/?p=784#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Interesting topic: the ethical dilemmas surrounding artists: photographers, writers, painters whatever. How do you capture something, ie a slum, without it being awkwardly degrading for the subject, or worse still, exploitative? 

Londoners: have you checked out the recent "favela" at the Southbank? Check it out, and let's have some dialogue..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting topic: the ethical dilemmas surrounding artists: photographers, writers, painters whatever. How do you capture something, ie a slum, without it being awkwardly degrading for the subject, or worse still, exploitative? </p>
<p>Londoners: have you checked out the recent &#8220;favela&#8221; at the Southbank? Check it out, and let&#8217;s have some dialogue..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

